@misc{Miltner2025,

title = {BRAID researchers' response to the call for contributions on artificial intelligence and creativity issued by the UN Special Rapporteur in the field of cultural rights, Alexandra Xanthaki.},

author = {Miltner, Kate and Moruzzi, Caterina and Parker, Martin and Potapov, Kyrill and Sichani, Anna-Maria and Westenberger, Paula},

doi = {10.5281/zenodo.15442454},

year  = {2025},

date = {2025-05-05},

urldate = {2025-05-05},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {misc}

}

@misc{nokey,

title = {How do people feel about AI? (Ada Lovelace Institute and The Alan Turing Institute, 2025)},

author = {Roshni Modhvadia and Tvesha Sippy and Octavia Field Reid and Helen Margetts},

url = {https://attitudestoai.uk/},

year  = {2025},

date = {2025-03-25},

urldate = {2025-03-25},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {misc}

}

@misc{nokey,

title = {Making good: : Insights on AI and public good from diverse UK communities (Ada Lovelace Institute, 2025) },

author = {Eleanor O’Keefe},

url = {https://www.adalovelaceinstitute.org/report/ai-public-good/},

year  = {2025},

date = {2025-03-25},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {misc}

}

@misc{nokey,

title = {BRAID researchers' response to UK Government copyright and AI consultation},

author = {Anna-Maria Sichani and Paula Westenberger and Nick Bryan-Kinns and Mercedes Bunz and Clementine Collett and Bahareh Baravi and Kate Miltner and Caterina Morruzzi and Beverley Alice Townsend},

doi = {10.5281/zenodo.14945987},

year  = {2025},

date = {2025-02-26},

urldate = {2025-02-26},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {misc}

}

@misc{Institute2025,

title = {Copyright and AI consultation: response from BRAID and Ada Lovelace Institute},

author = {Ada Lovelace Institute, & BRAID},

doi = {10.5281/zenodo.14938056},

year  = {2025},

date = {2025-02-25},

urldate = {2025-02-25},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {misc}

}

@misc{nokey,

title = {BRAID AI and the Arts: Who's Responsible (Curatorial event) - Visual Minutes},

author = {Jonny Glover and Beverley Hood},

doi = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14710565},

year  = {2025},

date = {2025-01-21},

urldate = {2024-01-19},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {misc}

}

@misc{nokey,

title = {BRAID AI and the Arts: Who's Responsible (Artists' event) – Consensus Statement},

author = {Beverley Hood},

doi = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14711008},

year  = {2025},

date = {2025-01-21},

urldate = {2024-01-18},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {misc}

}

@misc{nokey,

title = {BRAID AI and the Arts: Who's Responsible (Artists' event) - Visual Minutes},

author = {Jonny Glover and Beverley Hood},

doi = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14710975},

year  = {2025},

date = {2025-01-21},

urldate = {2024-01-18},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {misc}

}

@misc{nokey,

title = {BRAID AI and the Arts: Who's Responsible (Curatorial event) – Consensus Statement},

author = {Beverley Hood},

doi = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14710921},

year  = {2025},

date = {2025-01-21},

urldate = {2024-01-19},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {misc}

}

@misc{nokey,

title = {‘Agency’, in The Philosophical Glossary of AI},

author = {F Tollon and A Hattiangadi},

editor = {Alex Grzankowski and Benjamin Henke



},

url = {https://www.aiglossary.co.uk/index/agency},

year  = {2024},

date = {2024-12-05},

urldate = {2024-12-05},

journal = {The Philosophical Glossary of AI},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {misc}

}

@misc{nokey,

title = {'Moral Responsibility', in The Philosophical Glossary of AI},

author = {B Steyn and F Tollon},

editor = {Alex Grzankowski and Benjamin Henke},

url = {https://www.aiglossary.co.uk/index/moral-responsibility},

year  = {2024},

date = {2024-12-05},

urldate = {2024-12-05},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {misc}

}

@misc{nokey,

title = {New rules? Lessons for AI regulation from the governance  of other high-tech sectors},

author = {Julia Smakman and Matt Davies},

url = {https://www.adalovelaceinstitute.org/report/new-rules-ai-regulation/},

isbn = {978-1-7395236-8-8},

year  = {2024},

date = {2024-10-31},

urldate = {2024-10-31},

abstract = {The UK has seen a surge in the adoption of AI technologies across the private and public sectors in recent years, including in domains like education, healthcare and criminal justice. As AI is increasingly used to make highly consequential decisions about people’s lives, governments around the globe have started to propose and pass legislation to regulate these technologies.



While regulating AI brings its own challenges, it is not the first time that policymakers have grappled with governing highly complex technologies that play a central role in society and the economy. However, many of the current policy debates around AI typically seek to start from first principles rather than drawing on the lessons from previous attempts to regulate other domains.



This report looks at the regulatory structures, approaches and objectives of three other UK regulatory regimes that are commonly compared with AI in policy discussions:



Pharmaceuticals for human use

Financial services (with a focus on consumer protection and financial stability)

Climate change mitigation (specifically the carbon emissions regime established by the Climate Change Act 2008)},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {misc}

}